PILDAT Calls for Constitutional Adherence and Strategic Dialogue to Strengthen Democracy in Pakist
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT) has called for unwavering adherence to the Constitution and the initiation of strategic dialogue to bolster democratic governance in Pakistan.
In a statement issued on Thursday, PILDAT emphasized the necessity of dialogue among all institutions and stakeholders to safeguard Pakistan’s fragile democracy. The organization noted that this dialogue, which has been delayed, is vital for the country’s democratic progress and stability.
As the International Day of Democracy approaches on September 15, PILDAT highlighted ongoing challenges to Pakistan’s democracy, citing undue interference by institutions without constitutional authority. The statement critiqued the lack of advancement over the past year and pointed out that the postponed general elections scheduled for February 2024 have failed to offer a fair and equitable environment for all candidates.
PILDAT also observed that elected legislatures have not effectively tackled governance issues, with governments depending on higher authorities rather than addressing problems independently. The organization criticized the growing restrictions on citizens’ and media freedoms, along with inadequate progress in economic and security matters.
The report indicated worsening political polarization, deteriorating inter-institutional relations, and the potential for a significant clash between institutions. PILDAT warned that such a confrontation could harm Pakistan’s already fragile democratic system, which continues to lack elected local governments in crucial regions.
On a more positive note, PILDAT acknowledged the increased political awareness among youth, as evidenced by a notable rise in youth voter turnout to 48% in 2024. This heightened engagement has led many young people to use social media for political expression.
However, PILDAT expressed concern about the ruling elite’s response to online engagement, which has been branded as “digital terrorism” and “5th generation warfare.” The organization cautioned that such terminology reflects a dangerous “us versus them” perspective, where dissent is perceived as a threat rather than an opportunity for meaningful dialogue.
PILDAT concluded that promoting engagement rather than condemnation could more effectively address populism and foster democratic development.
