ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT) has emphasized the need for strict adherence to the Constitution and meaningful dialogue to enhance democratic governance in Pakistan.
In a statement released on Thursday, PILDAT stressed that a strategic dialogue among all institutions and stakeholders is crucial for the health of Pakistan’s fragile democracy. The organization highlighted that such a dialogue, already delayed, is essential for the country’s democratic progress and stability.
As the International Day of Democracy approaches on September 15, PILDAT noted that Pakistan’s democracy has faced persistent challenges due to interference from institutions lacking constitutional authority. The statement criticized the lack of progress over the past year, pointing out that the delayed general elections scheduled for February 2024 have not provided a fair and level playing field for all candidates.
PILDAT observed that elected legislatures have failed to address governance crises effectively, with governments relying on higher authorities rather than resolving issues independently. It also criticized the increasing curbs on citizens’ and media freedoms, and the slow progress in addressing economic and security challenges.
The report noted that political polarization has worsened, with inter-institutional relations deteriorating and a potential showdown between institutions looming. PILDAT warned that such a confrontation could be detrimental to Pakistan’s already fragile democratic system, which lacks elected local governments in key areas.
On a positive note, PILDAT acknowledged the rise in political awareness among young people, reflected in a significant increase in youth voter turnout to 48% in 2024. This growing engagement has led many young citizens to turn to social media for political expression.
However, PILDAT expressed concern over the ruling elite’s response to online engagement, which they have labeled as “digital terrorism” and “5th generation warfare.” The organization warned that such terms reflect a troubling “us versus them” mentality, where any dissent is seen as a threat rather than an opportunity for constructive engagement.
PILDAT concluded that fostering engagement rather than condemnation could better address populism and support democratic development.
